Vote manipulation in the 2024 presidential election is under serious scrutiny. According to data analyzed by the Election Truth Alliance, the red flags are hard to ignore.
Seven swing states. That’s how many swing states Donald Trump “won” in the 2024 Presidential election. All seven. Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada. The problem with that? A lot. And the Election Truth Alliance has a whole lot to say about it.
The Election Truth Alliance (ETA) is a non-profit organization of data scientists and cybersecurity experts dedicated to election integrity. Founded in December 2024 after their concerns about election security—outlined in a letter to Vice President Kamala Harris on November 13, 2024—went unanswered, the ETA has been tirelessly investigating the anomalies and irregularities that defined the 2024 election. Their findings so far? Deeply concerning.
Clark County, Nevada: A Statistical Anomaly
Let’s start with Nevada. The ETA’s analysis of early voting data in Clark County has uncovered patterns that raise serious concerns.
Specifically, as early voting numbers increased, Trump’s vote count showed a corresponding increase, while Kamala Harris’s count decreased. This anomaly deviates from typical voting patterns and raises questions about the integrity of the vote-counting process and the security of the systems handling those votes. It’s important to note that these findings are based on the ETA’s analysis of the official CVR data from Clark County.
Election results are the foundation of a functioning democracy. Any discrepancies—whether due to error, manipulation, or systemic flaws—demand immediate scrutiny. The ETA is calling for a full forensic audit and hand recount in Clark County. They argue that without transparency and accountability, public trust in future elections is at risk of being permanently eroded.
But this isn’t just about Nevada. The ETA’s data analysts have been combing through election results from all seven swing states and beyond, identifying troubling patterns that demand further investigation.
Pennsylvania: Vote-Counting Computers and Suspicious Drop-Off Trends
On January 19, President-Elect Trump made remarks at a rally, referencing Elon Musk’s familiarity with “vote-counting computers” and Pennsylvania’s election results. The ETA took note.
“The specific reference to ‘vote-counting computers’ in this context is concerning,” said Nathan Taylor, ETA Executive Director of Advocacy and Public Engagement. “Vote tabulators are critical to our election infrastructure. If they’ve been compromised, we have a serious problem.”
Pennsylvania reported a high volume of voting machine malfunctions on Election Day. At least 20 of 67 counties documented significant errors, primarily involving ballot scanner/tabulator failures. Many of these malfunctions were linked to Election Systems & Software (ES&S) and Dominion Voting Systems—companies that were at the center of major multi-state election security breaches between 2020 and 2024.
Independent cybersecurity research has long warned that a single compromised voting machine could manipulate votes with little risk of detection. Malicious software, once installed, can alter vote counts in mere minutes. And in Pennsylvania, data irregularities support the need for deeper investigation.
One glaring red flag is the “drop-off vote” pattern—where votes for the presidential race sharply diverged from those in down-ballot races. In 47 of 67 counties, Kamala Harris received fewer votes than Senator Bob Casey, Jr., a trend highly atypical of Pennsylvania’s voting history. In at least 17 of the 20 counties that experienced voting machine errors, this same irregular drop-off pattern appeared.
Suspicious Election Day Bomb Threats
If machine failures weren’t enough, Pennsylvania also saw over 30 counties targeted with bomb threats on Election Day—an unprecedented disruption tactic. Though no bombs were found, the threats led to evacuations and delayed voting and ballot counting. The FBI later confirmed that at least 200 of these threats originated from Russian email domains.
The combination of machine failures, unexplainable vote discrepancies, and coordinated threats to polling locations paints a disturbing picture. The ETA has called on state officials to conduct full audits and recounts in key counties to safeguard election integrity and ensure that every Pennsylvanian’s vote was accurately counted.
The Fight to #VerifyTheVote
As the ETA continues its data analysis, disturbing trends have emerged in other swing states as well. Cybersecurity experts warned of major election security breaches between 2020 and 2024, and now, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued sanctions against Iranian and Russian actors for attempted election interference. The implications of these findings are far-reaching.
To address these concerns, the ETA is launching legal challenges in key states. Their mission is clear:
- Legal Action: The ETA is seeking attorneys licensed in the seven swing states to challenge election irregularities.
- Volunteers: Data analysts, legal experts, and concerned citizens are encouraged to support the effort.
- Donations: The ETA is a grassroots organization that relies on public contributions to fund legal battles and forensic audits.
- Public Awareness: The organization is calling for transparency and public scrutiny to pressure election officials into action.
Censorship and the Battle for Information
It’s not just election results under fire—it’s also the ability to talk about them. I made a video breaking down the ETA’s study and posted it on TikTok on another account. The video was going viral—30,000 views, over 400 comments—until TikTok took it down for a vague “community guidelines violation.” No explanation, no response to my appeal. I started receiving message from several people that they could view the video, but could not share it or comment it. I submitted another appeal to tiktok through their direct link. Within about 36 hours, the video had not further restrictions attached to it. To date, there are about 112K views with thousands of shares and comments. But the suppression tactics early on affected the reach of the video.
This isn’t an isolated incident. Just last week, another video of mine was removed, this time for discussing Trump’s rally where he hinted at Elon Musk’s involvement in the election. The suppression of discussion around these findings only fuels suspicion. If there’s nothing to hide, why is big tech so desperate to silence people asking questions? Not to mention suppressing our voices FOR our government is what the First Amendement Freedom of Speech is all about.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Third party actors working on behalf of our government is a direct violation of our First Amendement rights.
Additional Findings
As outlined by the ETA, in 2024, Candidate Harris exceeded 2020 Democrat base voter turnout in:
- Wisconsin
- North Carolina
- Georgia
Averaged across all seven swing states, Candidate Harris received 99.6% of Biden’s votes from 2020. This highlights concerns for why Candidate Harris would be underperforming significantly while still retaining the party base.
The average overperformance of Candidate Trump outside the seven swing states is approximately 2%.
If additional overperformance above 2% in the swing states was caused by a vote-changing algorithm, then returning those votes would see Candidate Harris winning in six of the seven swing states this calculation can be conducted for.
The potential number of votes changed would be close to 1.5 million. This is not including any voter suppression such as mail-in ballots never being delivered.
The Bottom Line
This isn’t about partisanship. It’s about election integrity. If the 2024 election results were accurate, then transparency and verification should be welcomed, not obstructed. Instead, we’re seeing mass censorship, suppression of information, and resistance to even the most basic election audits.
The ETA is determined to pursue the truth, regardless of where it leads. Hand recounts, voting system audits, and forensic analysis are not extreme measures—they’re necessary steps to protect the democratic process. If we fail to demand accountability now, future elections may not be decided by the voters at all.
The question is simple: Was there vote manipulation in the 2024 presidential eleciton? If there’s nothing wrong with the election results, why is there such a fight to stop anyone from looking?
What Can You Do?
If you’re concerned about vote manipulation in the 2024 presidential election, here are several things you can do to both help put pressure on states to conduct a forensic audit, as well as support Election Truth Alliance with their work.
1. Donate directly to the Election Truth Alliance for both their work to expose the truth and to support the legal defense fund to sue states to conduct forensic audits. You can donate here.
2. Contact your state election officials and demand that your state perform a forensic audit based on the findings of the ETA. Download the script templates and who to contact here. Plug in your states information where indicated. Modify as you deem necessary.
3. Volunteer to help collect Count Vote Record (CVR) data in your state. Email the ETA to volunteer here.
We will keep you abreast of this information as it is released.